The 10 Best Salesforce Einstein & Sales Engagement Alternatives & Competitors

Looking for the best Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement alternatives to improve outbound execution, coaching, and revenue visibility in 2025? This guide compares the leading sales engagement and revenue intelligence platforms, including Revenue.io, Gong, Outreach, and Salesloft, based on automation depth, CRM alignment, and real-world sales impact.

Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement provide native AI insights, activity tracking, and basic cadence functionality inside Salesforce. While effective for many teams, growing sales organizations often require more advanced capabilities such as real-time coaching, deeper engagement analytics, stronger forecasting, and broader multi-channel execution.

This comparison highlights the top alternatives to Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement in 2025. From Salesforce-native platforms like Revenue.io to engagement and revenue intelligence tools such as Gong, Clari, and Outreach, each solution offers different strengths depending on sales motion, team size, and operational complexity.

Curated by sales and revenue technology experts with more than a decade of experience building and optimizing sales engagement and RevOps workflows, this guide is designed to help organizations evaluate platforms that increase productivity, improve coaching consistency, and drive predictable pipeline growth.

TL;DR: Salesforce Einstein & Sales Engagement Competitor Comparisons

Tool	Best For	Key Differentiator
Revenue.io	Salesforce sales teams needing advanced engagement and coaching	Salesforce-native dialing, guided selling, and real-time revenue intelligence
Gong	Teams focused on call analysis and deal insights	Conversation intelligence with AI-driven deal and pipeline analytics
Outreach	Sales teams running complex multi-channel sequences	Scalable sales engagement with automation and execution analytics
Salesloft	Organizations managing structured cadences and rep activity	Multi-channel sequencing with performance and coaching insights
Clari	Revenue leaders focused on forecasting accuracy	AI-powered pipeline inspection and revenue forecasting
Aviso	Enterprises needing predictive forecasting and scenario modeling	Advanced predictive analytics with deal risk scoring
Aircall	SMB sales and support teams	Simple cloud phone system with fast setup and CRM integrations
Dialpad	Teams wanting AI-powered cloud calling	Real-time transcription and AI voice insights
People.ai	RevOps teams focused on activity data and productivity	Automated activity capture and engagement analytics
Apollo.io	Teams combining prospecting with engagement	Built-in data, sequencing, and enrichment in one platform

When selecting these Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement alternatives, the focus was on what matters most to modern revenue teams:

• Deeper sales engagement and automation beyond native Salesforce capabilities.
• AI-driven insights that improve coaching, execution, and deal management.
• Strong CRM alignment that connects activity directly to pipeline outcomes.
• Scalability to support growing teams and more complex sales motions.

These capabilities are essential for organizations that want to move beyond basic activity tracking and unlock more consistent execution and predictable revenue performance.

Let’s take a closer look at how each solution compares.

1. Revenue.io

Ideal for: Salesforce-based sales teams that need advanced sales engagement, real-time coaching, and revenue intelligence beyond native Einstein capabilities.

Subtext: Replace basic Salesforce engagement features with guided selling, real-time coaching, and revenue visibility tied to every action.

Revenue.io is a Salesforce-native sales engagement and revenue orchestration platform designed to extend and enhance Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement. It centralizes dialing, sequencing, coaching, and pipeline insights directly inside Salesforce, allowing teams to execute and measure sales activity without switching tools.

Unlike Salesforce Einstein, which focuses primarily on predictive insights and activity recommendations, Revenue.io emphasizes execution and coaching in real time. Its guided selling workflows help reps follow structured cadences, prioritize next actions, and stay aligned with active opportunities throughout the sales cycle.

Revenue.io connects calls, emails, meetings, and tasks directly to accounts and opportunities, giving managers clear visibility into rep performance, deal risk, and pipeline health without relying on manual reporting or disconnected systems.

High Value Features

• Salesforce-native dialer with inbound and outbound calling

• Guided selling and AI-driven cadence execution

• Real-time call coaching and in-call guidance with Moments

• Automated activity capture and CRM updates

• Deal and pipeline visibility tied to engagement activity

• Revenue intelligence dashboards for forecasting and inspection

• Generative Scorecards for scalable coaching and QA

• Deep integration with Salesforce and communication tools

Pricing

Custom pricing based on team size, feature configuration, and Salesforce environment. Designed for mid-market and enterprise sales organizations operating fully in Salesforce.

Who’s Better: Revenue.io vs Salesforce Einstein & Sales Engagement

Revenue.io is better suited for teams that want hands-on execution, live coaching, and structured sales workflows beyond Salesforce’s native capabilities. It focuses on helping reps execute consistently and tying every action to revenue outcomes.

Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement are effective for organizations that want native AI insights and basic activity orchestration within Salesforce but do not require advanced coaching or engagement depth.

For Salesforce teams looking to move beyond recommendations into real-time execution and revenue accountability, Revenue.io offers a more complete alternative. Explore a comprehensive comparison between the two solutions.

2. Gong

Ideal for: Sales and revenue teams that want deep visibility into conversations, deal progression, and rep performance.

Subtext: Analyze sales conversations to improve coaching, deal execution, and pipeline predictability.

Gong is a conversation intelligence and revenue analytics platform that captures, transcribes, and analyzes sales calls and meetings. It is often evaluated alongside Salesforce Einstein for its ability to surface insights about buyer behavior, deal risk, and rep effectiveness.

Unlike Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement, Gong does not manage cadences or outreach execution. Instead, it focuses on post-interaction analysis, helping teams understand what happened in calls and how those conversations impact pipeline outcomes.

Gong integrates with Salesforce to enrich opportunities with conversation data, providing leaders with deal-level visibility and coaching insights based on real customer interactions.

High Value Features

• AI-driven conversation analysis for calls and meetings

• Deal risk indicators and pipeline visibility dashboards

• Automated call transcription and topic tracking

• Salesforce and communication tool integrations

Pricing

Custom pricing based on user count, call volume, and analytics features. Commonly used by mid-market and enterprise sales teams.

Who’s Better: Gong vs Salesforce Einstein & Sales Engagement

Gong is better suited for teams that prioritize conversation insights and deal analysis over activity orchestration. It provides deeper call intelligence than Salesforce Einstein but does not replace engagement workflows.

Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement are better for native activity tracking and task automation inside Salesforce. Teams focused on understanding buyer conversations and coaching based on call data may find Gong a stronger complement or alternative.

3. Outreach

Ideal for: Sales teams running complex, multi-channel outbound programs at scale.

Subtext: Automate and manage structured sales sequences across email, calls, and social channels.

Outreach is a sales engagement platform designed to help teams execute consistent outbound and follow-up workflows. It provides sequencing, task management, and engagement analytics to ensure reps follow best practices and maintain pipeline coverage.

Compared to Salesforce Sales Engagement, Outreach offers more advanced sequencing, analytics, and automation, making it a common alternative for teams that outgrow Salesforce’s native cadence functionality.

Outreach integrates with Salesforce to sync activities, opportunities, and engagement data, giving managers visibility into rep execution and pipeline momentum.

High Value Features

• Multi-channel sequencing across email, calls, and social

• Automated task management and rep workflows

• Engagement analytics tied to pipeline performance

• Salesforce integration for activity and opportunity syncing

Pricing

Tiered pricing based on feature set and number of users. Typically adopted by mid-market and enterprise sales organizations.

Who’s Better: Outreach vs Salesforce Einstein & Sales Engagement

Outreach is better for teams that need advanced sequencing, automation, and sales engagement analytics beyond Salesforce’s native tools. It provides greater flexibility and scale for outbound programs.

Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement are a better fit for organizations that want basic engagement workflows fully native to Salesforce without adding an external platform.

Teams running high-volume or complex outbound motions often prefer Outreach for its depth and execution control.

4. Salesloft

Ideal for: Sales teams that need structured cadences, engagement analytics, and rep activity management at scale.

Subtext: Execute consistent multi-channel outreach with visibility into rep performance and engagement impact.

Salesloft is a sales engagement platform that helps teams manage outbound and follow-up workflows through structured cadences across email, calls, and social channels. It is commonly evaluated as an alternative to Salesforce Sales Engagement for organizations that need more flexibility and analytics.

Compared to Salesforce Einstein and native Sales Engagement, Salesloft offers deeper cadence customization, stronger reporting, and built-in coaching insights. It integrates with Salesforce to sync activities and opportunity data, allowing leaders to track how engagement impacts pipeline progression.

Salesloft focuses on execution and engagement consistency rather than predictive forecasting or revenue modeling.

High Value Features

• Multi-channel cadences for email, calls, and social outreach

• Engagement analytics and rep activity reporting

• Conversation insights and coaching tools

• Salesforce integration for activity and opportunity syncing

Pricing

Tiered pricing based on features and user count. Commonly used by mid-market and enterprise sales teams.

Who’s Better: Salesloft vs Salesforce Einstein & Sales Engagement

Salesloft is better for teams that want more control over cadences, engagement analytics, and execution workflows. It provides greater depth than Salesforce’s native engagement tools.

Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement are better suited for teams that prefer native functionality with simpler workflows and less operational overhead.

5. Clari

Ideal for: Revenue leaders and RevOps teams focused on forecasting accuracy and pipeline visibility.

Subtext: Improve forecast confidence with AI-driven pipeline inspection and revenue insights.

Clari is a revenue intelligence and forecasting platform designed to help organizations inspect pipeline, manage forecasts, and identify deal risk. It is often evaluated alongside Salesforce Einstein for forecasting and revenue visibility use cases.

While Salesforce Einstein provides predictive insights within Salesforce, Clari delivers more robust forecasting workflows, pipeline inspection tools, and executive reporting. It aggregates data across opportunities, activity, and historical performance to support revenue decision-making.

Clari does not manage sales engagement or cadences, making it complementary or alternative rather than a direct replacement for Salesforce Sales Engagement.

High Value Features

• AI-powered forecasting and pipeline inspection

• Deal risk indicators and revenue trend analysis

• Forecast rollups and executive reporting

• Salesforce integration for opportunity and activity data

Pricing

Custom pricing based on forecasting modules, user roles, and deployment scale.

Who’s Better: Clari vs Salesforce Einstein & Sales Engagement

Clari is better suited for organizations that need advanced forecasting and revenue governance beyond Salesforce’s native predictive tools.

Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement are more appropriate for teams focused on day-to-day sales execution and activity tracking rather than forecast management.

6. Aviso

Ideal for: Enterprises and revenue teams that need advanced predictive forecasting and deal risk analysis.

Subtext: Use AI-driven forecasting and scenario modeling to improve revenue predictability.

Aviso is a revenue intelligence and forecasting platform focused on predictive analytics, deal inspection, and forecast accuracy. It is often evaluated as an alternative to Salesforce Einstein for organizations that require more sophisticated revenue modeling and forecasting workflows.

Compared to Salesforce Einstein, Aviso provides deeper predictive insights, including scenario planning and win probability analysis based on historical and real-time data. It integrates with Salesforce to analyze opportunities, pipeline trends, and sales activity at scale.

Aviso does not manage sales engagement or cadences, making it best suited for revenue leadership and RevOps teams rather than frontline sellers.

High Value Features

• Predictive forecasting with AI-based win probability scoring

• Scenario modeling and pipeline simulation

• Deal risk identification and revenue trend analysis

• Salesforce integration for opportunity and pipeline data

Pricing

Enterprise pricing based on deployment scope, forecasting modules, and user roles.

Who’s Better: Aviso vs Salesforce Einstein & Sales Engagement

Aviso is better for organizations that need advanced predictive forecasting and scenario planning beyond Salesforce’s native AI capabilities.

Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement are better suited for teams focused on sales execution, activity tracking, and basic predictive insights inside Salesforce.

7. Aircall

Ideal for: SMB and mid-market sales and support teams that need a simple cloud phone system with CRM integration.

Subtext: Enable inbound and outbound calling with a lightweight, easy-to-deploy phone platform.

Aircall is a cloud-based phone system designed for sales and customer support teams that want quick setup and reliable calling without complex configuration. It integrates with Salesforce to log calls and associate activity with contacts and accounts.

As an alternative to Salesforce Sales Engagement dialing features, Aircall provides standalone calling functionality but does not offer guided selling, sequencing, or real-time coaching.

Aircall is best suited for teams that want a focused phone system rather than a full sales engagement or revenue intelligence platform.

High Value Features

• Cloud-based inbound and outbound calling

• Call routing, IVR, and queue management

• Salesforce integration for call logging

• Call recording and basic analytics

Pricing

Tiered pricing based on user count and feature set. Commonly adopted by small and growing teams.

Who’s Better: Aircall vs Salesforce Einstein & Sales Engagement

Aircall is a better fit for teams that need simple calling functionality without additional engagement or analytics layers.

Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement are more appropriate for teams that want calling tied directly to Salesforce workflows, tasks, and activity orchestration.

8. Dialpad

Ideal for: Sales and support teams that want AI-powered cloud calling with real-time transcription.

Subtext: Improve call visibility and productivity with AI-driven voice intelligence.

Dialpad is a cloud calling platform known for its built-in AI capabilities, including real-time call transcription and keyword tracking. It supports sales, support, and internal communication use cases, making it a common alternative to Salesforce’s native dialing features.

Compared to Salesforce Sales Engagement, Dialpad provides stronger voice intelligence but does not manage cadences, guided selling workflows, or deal-level engagement. It integrates with Salesforce to log call activity but remains a standalone phone system rather than a full engagement platform.

Dialpad is best suited for teams that prioritize AI-powered calling insights over structured sales execution.

High Value Features

• Real-time call transcription and AI-generated insights

• Cloud-based inbound and outbound calling

• Keyword tracking and conversation visibility

• Salesforce integration for call logging

Pricing

Tiered pricing based on users and AI feature access.

Who’s Better: Dialpad vs Salesforce Einstein & Sales Engagement

Dialpad is better for teams that want AI-powered voice intelligence without managing full engagement workflows.

Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement are better suited for teams that need activity orchestration, task management, and Salesforce-native execution.

9. People.ai

Ideal for: Revenue operations teams focused on activity data accuracy and productivity analytics.

Subtext: Turn sales activity data into actionable insights for performance and forecasting.

People.ai is a revenue operations and activity intelligence platform designed to automatically capture and analyze sales activity across email, calendar, and CRM systems. It is an alternative to Salesforce Einstein for analytics and productivity insights.

Unlike Salesforce Sales Engagement, People.ai does not manage outreach or cadences. Instead, it focuses on data capture, hygiene, and analytics, helping organizations understand how activity levels correlate with revenue outcomes.

People.ai integrates deeply with Salesforce to provide visibility into rep behavior, account engagement, and pipeline coverage.

High Value Features

• Automated activity and engagement data capture

• Productivity and performance data

• Account and opportunity engagement insights

• Salesforce integration for CRM data enrichment

Pricing

Enterprise pricing based on user count, data sources, and analytics modules.

Who’s Better: People.ai vs Salesforce Einstein & Sales Engagement

People.ai is better for organizations that need accurate activity data and RevOps analytics beyond Salesforce’s native reporting.

Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement are better for teams that want built-in AI insights tied directly to execution workflows.

10. Apollo.io

Ideal for: Sales teams that want prospecting, engagement, and sequencing in a single platform.

Subtext: Combine data, outreach, and basic engagement workflows in one tool.

Apollo.io is a sales engagement and data platform that combines contact data, enrichment, and outbound sequencing. It is often used by teams looking for an all-in-one alternative to Salesforce Sales Engagement and external prospecting tools.

Compared to Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement, Apollo.io offers stronger prospecting and data access, but lighter coaching, analytics, and CRM-native execution. It integrates with Salesforce to sync contacts and activities, but operates primarily as a separate workspace.

Apollo.io is well-suited for smaller teams and growth-stage organizations that want to centralize prospecting and outreach.

High Value Features

• Contact and account data with enrichment

• Email and call sequencing for outbound outreach

• Basic engagement analytics and reporting

• Salesforce integration for contact and activity sync

Pricing

Tiered pricing based on users, data access, and outreach volume.

Who’s Better: Apollo.io vs Salesforce Einstein & Sales Engagement

Apollo.io is better for teams that want prospecting and outreach combined without relying heavily on Salesforce-native tools.

Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement are better suited for organizations that want engagement fully embedded in Salesforce with tighter workflow and reporting alignment.

Why We Chose Revenue.io as the Best Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement Alternative

After reviewing the leading Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement alternatives in 2025, Revenue.io stands out as the most complete option for sales teams that operate inside Salesforce and need more than native recommendations and task automation.

Salesforce Einstein and Sales Engagement provide solid AI insights and basic cadence functionality, but they stop short of real-time execution and coaching. Revenue.io fills that gap by combining guided selling, live call coaching, sequencing, and revenue intelligence directly within Salesforce. This allows teams to move from insight to action without switching tools or losing data fidelity.

Revenue.io’s Salesforce-native design ensures that every call, email, task, and conversation is tied directly to accounts, opportunities, and pipeline outcomes. Reps benefit from structured workflows and real-time guidance, while managers gain visibility into execution quality, deal risk, and revenue impact without relying on manual reporting.

While Revenue.io is not the lowest-cost option, it provides the strongest value for Salesforce-centric organizations that want consistent execution, improved coaching, and clear accountability across the full sales cycle.

For teams that rely heavily on Salesforce and want to extend Einstein insights into real-world sales execution, Revenue.io is the best alternative for scaling engagement, improving performance, and driving predictable pipeline growth. For organizations that prioritize forecasting, prospecting, or light engagement outside Salesforce, platforms like Clari, Apollo.io, or Outreach may be a better operational fit.