The definition of deal slippage is a sales term used to describe opportunities that were forecasted to close within a specific time period but fail to do so and are pushed into a future date. Unlike lost deals, slipped deals remain in the pipeline but introduce uncertainty in revenue forecasting and pipeline accuracy.
Deal slippage is common in B2B sales, where long sales cycles, multiple stakeholders, and complex approvals often delay decision-making.
Instead of closing as expected, these deals require additional follow-up, renegotiation, or further stakeholder alignment, often stretching over weeks or months. Identifying and addressing slippage is critical for maintaining forecast reliability and attaining consistent revenue growth.
Tracking deal slippage begins with understanding your sales pipeline in real time. A deal is considered “slipped” when it was forecasted to close in a specific period, often a quarter, but is pushed to a later date without being closed or marked lost.
To identify slippage:
Tools like Revenue.io can automate alerts when high-risk deals are pushed or delayed, allowing teams to act before the quarter ends.
Establish regular pipeline reviews where reps justify close dates with buyer signals (e.g., signed contracts, confirmed meetings). Tracking slippage helps sales leaders understand where deals get stuck and why, turning gut instincts into data-backed decisions.
Deal slippage usually stems from a mix of external and internal factors that delay closing. Here are some of the most common causes, and how to prevent them:
Preventing slippage requires both better sales hygiene and tighter operational processes.
Though often confused, deal slippage and lost deals are very different, and knowing the distinction is critical for sales forecasting and pipeline health.
Deal Slippage
A slipped deal hasn’t closed yet; it’s been delayed, not lost. The close date has been pushed into a future period, often due to extended decision-making, stakeholder delays, or procurement blockages.
Lost Deals
A lost deal is one where the buyer has explicitly said “no,” chosen a competitor, gone dark, or is no longer pursuing the purchase. It’s removed from the forecast and typically marked with a reason for loss.
Here’s why the distinction matters:
Treating slipped deals like closed-won opportunities distorts your pipeline. Treating them like lost deals may cause premature disengagement. The best practice? Create a separate “slipped” status in your CRM and revisit the deal with a refreshed engagement plan.
Deal slippage is one of the top threats to accurate sales forecasting. When a deal expected to close in Q3 slips into Q4 (or further), it throws off revenue projections and can erode executive trust in your pipeline data.
Here’s how slippage hurts forecasting:
Slippage often signals underlying issues like misalignment with buyer timelines, poor qualification, or overconfident reps. It also suggests that deals were forecasted based on gut feeling, not verified buyer signals.
Accurate forecasting doesn’t mean predicting the future perfectly, it means managing risk and identifying patterns early. Addressing slippage is step one.